## page was renamed from AJMGrpOnly/teaching/electronic-structure/practical5 ## page was renamed from ajm/teaching/electronic-structure/practical5 <> = AMH: DFT calculations with NWChem = We now re-visit the AMH dimers (both of them) using density functional theory. We already know from the Ar$_2$ examples we have done that most density functionals are rather poor for van der Waals dimers. The AMH system is not quite a van der Waals system, but it has a strong dispersion contribution, so any density functional we use will need to be corrected for the missing dispersion energy. Further, according to Griffiths et al., there is a problem with PBE: it overbinds the //P4/nmm// phase due to a charge-transfer problem that manifests in an overbinding at long range. You will need to test PBE for both of these issues and propose fixes. You will need to decide on * Which functional to use: PBE or PBE0 or some other? Remember you need to justify your choice. * Dispersion correction or no dispersion correction? * Explain the observations highlighted on the previous lab page using these calculations. * The goal of this report is to use your calculations to best explain the main results of the paper - particularly those I have highlighted in the previous laboratory page. == Scripts == The script on the [[ajm/teaching/electronic-structure/practical4|AMH laboratory page]] can be modified to do a DFT calculation. I've included an example here. Here's a script for the molecular dimer. This one does a PBE+D calculation. It's provided only as a template. You will need to decide just which calculation you need. [[attachment:AMH PBE+D]] {{{ #!/usr/bin/env python import argparse, numpy, subprocess, re, sys, os import numpy, re, sys, subprocess #import matplotlib.pyplot as plt # Parse command-line arguments parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description = """ Create a set of NWChem input files for the Ar2 dimer, run NWChem on them, and parse the output for interaction energy. """) parser.add_argument("-m", "--min", dest="minR", type=float, default=1., help="minimum Ar separation in A") parser.add_argument("-M", "--max", dest="maxR", type=float, default=5., help="maximum Ar separation in A") parser.add_argument("-d", "--delta", dest="deltaR", type=float, default=0.5, help="step size for Ar separation in A") parser.add_argument("-o", "--output", dest="output", type=str, default="output.txt", help="output text file") parser.add_argument("-np", "--nproc", dest="nproc", type=int, default=1, help="Number of processors to be used.") parser.add_argument("-b", "--basis", dest="basis", type=str, default="aug-cc-pvtz", help="basis set used in calculation") args = parser.parse_args() nwchem_dir = os.environ["NWCHEM_TOP"] username = os.environ["USER"] nproc = args.nproc # I have commented out the uniform grid: #positions = numpy.arange(args.minR, args.maxR + 0.00001, args.deltaR) # Instead, use a non-uniform grid specific to your system: positions = numpy.array([1.7,2.1,2.3,2.5,2.7,3.1,4.0,5.0,10.0,20.0]) print "Basis set ",args.basis print "positions = ", positions print "Output to : ",args.output print "Number of processors : ",nproc output = open(args.output,'w') # Conversion factor: au2cm = 219474.631371 au2kJ = 2625.499 # Construct input files input_file_template = """ title "NH3..H2O BSSE corrected DFT interaction energy" scratch_dir /scratch/HDD_2T/{user}/nwchem geometry units angstrom "NH3+H2O" N 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 H1 0.98601 0.00000 -0.30465 H2 -0.46058 0.84108 -0.38142 H3 -0.46058 -0.84108 -0.38142 O 0.00000 0.00000 {RzO} H4 0.00000 0.00000 {RzH4} H5 -0.96568 -0.00000 {RzH5} end geometry units angstrom "NH3+ghost" N 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 H1 0.98601 0.00000 -0.30465 H2 -0.46058 0.84108 -0.38142 H3 -0.46058 -0.84108 -0.38142 BqO 0.00000 0.00000 {RzO} BqH 0.00000 0.00000 {RzH4} BqH -0.96568 -0.00000 {RzH5} end geometry units angstrom "ghost+H2O" BqN 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 BqH 0.98601 0.00000 -0.30465 BqH -0.46058 0.84108 -0.38142 BqH -0.46058 -0.84108 -0.38142 O 0.00000 0.00000 {RzO} H4 0.00000 0.00000 {RzH4} H5 -0.96568 -0.00000 {RzH5} end basis N library {basis} H1 library {basis} H2 library {basis} H3 library {basis} O library {basis} H4 library {basis} H5 library {basis} BqN library N {basis} BqH library H {basis} BqO library O {basis} end dft xc xpbe96 cpbe96 iterations 200 disp direct end set geometry "NH3+H2O" charge 0 task dft unset geometry "NH3+H2O" dft; vectors hcore; end set geometry "NH3+ghost" charge 0 task dft unset geometry "NH3+ghost" dft; vectors hcore; end set geometry "ghost+H2O" charge 0 task dft unset geometry "ghost+H2O" """ # z coordinates for O, H4 and H5 : H2O will be translated along the z-axis # Units: Angstrom zO = 0.0 zH4 = -1.03900 zH5 = 0.27836 # Regular expressions to find the right lines in the file dft_re = re.compile("Total DFT energy =\s+(-?[0-9]+.[0-9]+)") # Dictionary to store the energies we find energies = {} # Main loop through different position values for delta_z in positions: print "Current position = ",delta_z input_file_name = "in-R{0:5.3f}.nw".format(delta_z) output_file_name = "out-R{0:5.3f}.out".format(delta_z) # Write input file Rz_O = zO + delta_z Rz_H4 = zH4 + delta_z Rz_H5 = zH5 + delta_z RzO = """{0:10.6f}""".format(Rz_O) RzH4 = """{0:10.6f}""".format(Rz_H4) RzH5 = """{0:10.6f}""".format(Rz_H5) input_file = open(input_file_name, "w") input_file.write(input_file_template.format(RzO=RzO,RzH4=RzH4,RzH5=RzH5,user=username,basis=args.basis)) input_file.close() # Run NWChem output_file = open(output_file_name, "w") subprocess.call(["mpirun.mpich","-np",str(nproc),"nwchem", input_file_name], stdout=output_file, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT) output_file.close() # Read output file back in output_file = open(output_file_name, "r") dft_energies = [] for line in output_file: dft_match = dft_re.search(line) if dft_match: dft_energies.append(float(dft_match.group(1))) output_file.close() if not (len(dft_energies) == 3): print "Apparent error in output file! {0:d} DFT energies found.".format(len(dft_energies)) sys.exit(1) energies[delta_z] = dft_energies dft_dimer = energies[delta_z][0] dft_monomerA = energies[delta_z][1] dft_monomerB = energies[delta_z][2] dft_interaction = dft_dimer - dft_monomerA - dft_monomerB print "Eint[DFT] = ",dft_interaction*au2kJ # prepare plots dft_dimer = numpy.array([energies[p][0] for p in positions]) dft_monomerA = numpy.array([energies[p][1] for p in positions]) dft_monomerB = numpy.array([energies[p][2] for p in positions]) dft_interaction = dft_dimer - dft_monomerA - dft_monomerB # convert to kJ/mol dft_interaction = au2kJ*dft_interaction output.write(('%10s '*5 + '\n') % (" R ","DFT monoA","DFT monoB","DFT dimr","DFT int ")) for i in range(len(positions)): output.write(('%10.6f '*5 + '\n') % (positions[i], dft_monomerA[i], dft_monomerB[i], dft_dimer[i], dft_interaction[i])) output.close() }}} {{{#!wiki important Important Start with the calculations used in by Griffiths et al. * PBE * PBE0 * PBE+D * PBE0+D Then consider using the LC functionals you used on Ar$_2$. Do these improve on PBE0+D? Remember that you need to do this for both dimers. }}}