|
Size: 3148
Comment:
|
Size: 3618
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 21: | Line 21: |
| * updated experimental inputs: exclusive: '''V,,ub,, = 3.26 +/- 0.30 10^-3^''' | * updated experimental inputs: exclusive: '''V,,ub,, = 3.26 +/- 0.30 10^-3^''' |
| Line 26: | Line 28: |
| * updated experimental inputs: exclusive: '''V,,cb,, = 39.5 +/- 1.0 10^-3^''' | * updated experimental inputs: exclusive: '''V,,cb,, = 39.5 +/- 1.0 10^-3^''' |
| Line 49: | Line 53: |
* compatibility plots: .to “measure” the agreement of a single measurement with the indirect determination from the fit using all the other inputs: Color code: agreement between the predicted values and the measurements at better than 1, 2, ...nsigma The cross has the coordinates (x,y)=(central value, error) of the direct measurement |
Marcella Bona's wiki
UTfit: post EPS11 update for LP conference
- input updates:
- gamma: including the EPS updates
updated experimental value: 79 +/- 10 degrees
gamma plot with all the separate contributions: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/gamma_postEPS11.eps
gamma on the rhobar-etabar plane: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/gamma_rhoetaplane.eps
- r parameters:
DK decays: r(DK) = 0.104 +/- 0.013: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/r_vs_gamma_postEPS11.eps
D*K decays: r(D*K) = 0.10 +/- 0.03: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/rstar_vs_gamma_postEPS11.eps
DK* decays: r(DK*) = 0.11 +/- 0.06: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/rkstd_vs_gamma_postEPS11.eps
DK* decays: r(DK*) = 0.26 +/- 0.08: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/rdkst0_vs_gamma_postEPS11.eps
Vub: including the EPS updates
- updated experimental inputs:
exclusive: Vub = 3.26 +/- 0.30 10-3
inclusive: Vub = 4.40 +/- 0.31 10-3
updated experimental value used as incl+excl combination: Vub = 3.83 +/- 0.57 10-3
Vub plot with all the separate contributions: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/semilep/vub_postEPS11.eps
- updated experimental inputs:
Vcb: including the EPS updates
- updated experimental inputs:
exclusive: Vcb = 39.5 +/- 1.0 10-3
inclusive: Vcb = 41.7 +/- 0.7 10-3
updated experimental value used as incl+excl combination: Vcb = 41.0 +/- 1.0 10-3
Vcb plot with all the separate contributions: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/semilep/vcb_postEPS11.eps
- updated experimental inputs:
- gamma: including the EPS updates
- Standard Model fit updates:
rhobar-etabar plane with all the constraints: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/all_postEPS11.eps
- numerical results:
parameter
fit output
rhobar
0.132 +/- 0.020
etabar
0.353 +/- 0.014
alpha
88 +/- 3
beta
22 +/- 1
gamma
69 +/- 3
- numerical results:
rhobar-etabar plane using angles only: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/angles_postEPS11.eps
parameter
fit output
rhobar
0.129 +/- 0.027
etabar
0.340 +/- 0.016
rhobar-etabar plane not using angles (sides and epsk): http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/sides_postEPS11.eps
parameter
fit output
rhobar
0.155 +/- 0.038
etabar
0.404 +/- 0.039
- compatibility plots: .to “measure” the agreement of a single measurement with the indirect determination from the fit using all the other inputs:
- Color code: agreement between the predicted values and the measurements at better than 1, 2, ...nsigma The cross has the coordinates (x,y)=(central value, error) of the direct measurement
- input updates: