Differences between revisions 81 and 84 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 81 as of 2011-08-21 22:32:47
Size: 5957
Editor: apw133
Comment:
Revision 84 as of 2011-08-24 10:50:35
Size: 6259
Editor: apw133
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 11: Line 11:
   * '''post EPS11 update''' for LP conference === post EPS11 update for LP conference ===
Line 42: Line 43:
              corresponding to a difference of '''~1,6 sigma''' with respect to the experimental value
Line 46: Line 48:
              corresponding to a difference of '''~3,2 sigma''' with respect to the experimental value

=== SM update ===
Line 70: Line 76:
           || compatibilty plots || UTfit value || experimental value || ~sigmas ||            || compatibilty plots || UTfit value || experimental value || difference in ~sigmas ||
Line 79: Line 85:

=== NP update ===
      * Standard Model fit updates:

Marcella Bona's wiki

UTfit

post EPS11 update for LP conference

SM update

  • Standard Model fit updates:
    • rhobar-etabar plane with all the constraints: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/all_postEPS11.eps

      • numerical results:

        parameter

        fit output

        rhobar

        0.132 +/- 0.020

        etabar

        0.353 +/- 0.014

        alpha

        88 +/- 3

        beta

        22 +/- 1

        gamma

        69 +/- 3

    • rhobar-etabar plane using angles only: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/angles_postEPS11.eps

      • parameter

        fit output

        rhobar

        0.129 +/- 0.027

        etabar

        0.340 +/- 0.016

    • rhobar-etabar plane not using angles (sides and epsk): http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/sides_postEPS11.eps

      • parameter

        fit output

        rhobar

        0.155 +/- 0.038

        etabar

        0.404 +/- 0.039

    • compatibility plots: .to “measure” the agreement of a single measurement with the indirect determination from the fit using all the other inputs:
      • Color code: agreement between the predicted values and the measurements at better than 1, 2, ...nsigma.//
        • The cross has the coordinates (x,y)=(central value, error) of the direct measurement

        compatibilty plots

        UTfit value

        experimental value

        difference in ~sigmas

        sin2beta

        0.795 +/- 0.051

        0.667 +/- 0.021

        2.3

        alpha [degrees]

        85 +/- 4

        91 +/- 6

        0.7

        DeltaMs [ps-1]

        19.1 +/- 1.5

        17.70 +/- 0.08

        1.0

        Vub [10-3]

        3.63 +/- 0.15

        3.83 +/- 0.57

        0.3

        gamma [degrees]

        69 +/- 3

        79 +/- 10

        0.9

        B to taunu [10-4]

        0.83 +/- 0.08

        1.64 +/- 0.34

        2.3

        Bs to ll [10-9]

        3.55 +/- 0.28

        18 +/- 11

        1.3

        Bk

        0.88 +/- 0.09

        0.731 +/- 0.036

        1.4

NP update

  • Standard Model fit updates:

MarcellaBona (last edited 2019-09-16 13:53:42 by apw133)