Diff for "MarcellaBona"

Differences between revisions 88 and 97 (spanning 9 versions)

Marcella Bona's wiki

UTfit

EPS talk updated

my EPS talk updated with the new numbers and the new plots:

post EPS11 update for LP conference

input updates:
- gamma: including the EPS updates
  - updated experimental value: 79 +/- 10 degrees
  - gamma plot with all the separate contributions: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/gamma_postEPS11.eps
  - gamma on the rhobar-etabar plane: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/gamma_rhoetaplane.eps
  - r parameters:
    - DK decays: r(DK) = 0.104 +/- 0.013: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/r_vs_gamma_postEPS11.eps
    - D*K decays: r(D*K) = 0.10 +/- 0.03: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/rstar_vs_gamma_postEPS11.eps
    - DK* decays: r(DK*) = 0.11 +/- 0.06: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/rkstd_vs_gamma_postEPS11.eps
    - DK* decays: r(DK*) = 0.26 +/- 0.08: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/gamma/rdkst0_vs_gamma_postEPS11.eps
- V_ub: including the EPS updates
  - updated experimental inputs:
    - exclusive: V_ub = 3.26 +/- 0.30 10^-3
      inclusive: V_ub = 4.40 +/- 0.31 10^-3
  - the discrepancy between the two values is at the level of 2.6 sigmas
  - updated experimental value used as incl+excl combination: V_ub = 3.83 +/- 0.57 10^-3
  - V_ub plot with all the separate contributions: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/semilep/vub_postEPS11.eps
  - compatibility plot with the rest of the fit (see below for explanation): http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/pulls/pull_Vubfit1.eps
- V_cb: including the EPS updates
  - updated experimental inputs:
    - exclusive: V_cb = 39.5 +/- 1.0 10^-3
      inclusive: V_cb = 41.7 +/- 0.7 10^-3
  - the discrepancy between the two values is at the level of 1.8 sigmas
  - updated experimental value used as incl+excl combination: V_cb = 41.0 +/- 1.0 10^-3
  - V_cb plot with all the separate contributions: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/semilep/vcb_postEPS11.eps

Standard Model fit: inclusive vs exclusive

exclusive only:
- rhobar-etabar planes with all the constraints: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/semilep/all_exclusive_postEPS11.eps
- sin2beta compatibility plot: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/semilep/pull_sin2bfit3_exclusive.eps
  - sin2beta from the rest of the fit: sin2beta = 0.706 +/- 0.041 corresponding to a difference of ~0.8 sigma with respect to the experimental value
inclusive only:
- rhobar-etabar planes with all the constraints: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/semilep/all_inclusive_postEPS11.eps
- sin2beta compatibility plot: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/semilep/pull_sin2bfit3_inclusive.eps
  - sin2beta from the rest of the fit: sin2beta = 0.791 +/- 0.041 corresponding to a difference of ~2.6 sigma with respect to the experimental value

sin2beta predictions: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/sin2beta_nosemileptonic.eps

inputs used	sin2beta value	sigmas from the experimental value
no semileptonic (no Vub or Vcb)	0.76 +/- 0.10	0.9
exclusive only	0.706 +/- 0.041	0.8
inclusive only	0.791 +/- 0.041	2.6

sin2beta compatibility plot without using the semileptonic results: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/pulls/pull_sin2bfit3_nosemileptonic.eps

SM update

Standard Model fit updates:

rhobar-etabar plane with all the constraints: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/all_postEPS11.eps
- same plot only rectangular: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/all_postEPS11_rectangular.eps
  - numerical results:
  parameter
  
  fit output
  
  rhobar
  
  0.132 +/- 0.020
  
  etabar
  
  0.353 +/- 0.014
  
  alpha
  
  88 +/- 3
  
  beta
  
  22 +/- 1
  
  gamma
  
  69 +/- 3
rhobar-etabar plane using angles only: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/angles_postEPS11.eps
- same plot only rectangular: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/angles_postEPS11_rectangular.eps
  
  parameter
  
  fit output
  
  rhobar
  
  0.129 +/- 0.027
  
  etabar
  
  0.340 +/- 0.016
rhobar-etabar plane not using angles (sides and epsk): http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/sides_postEPS11.eps
- same plot only rectangular: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/sides_postEPS11_rectangular.eps
  
  parameter
  
  fit output
  
  rhobar
  
  0.155 +/- 0.038
  
  etabar
  
  0.404 +/- 0.039

compatibility plots: .to “measure” the agreement of a single measurement with the indirect determination from the fit using all the other inputs:

Color code: agreement between the predicted values and the measurements at better than 1, 2, ...nsigma.//

The cross has the coordinates (x,y)=(central value, error) of the direct measurement

compatibilty plots	UTfit value	experimental value	difference in ~sigmas
sin2beta	0.795 +/- 0.051	0.667 +/- 0.021	2.3
alpha [degrees]	85 +/- 4	91 +/- 6	0.7
DeltaMs [ps^-1]	19.1 +/- 1.5	17.70 +/- 0.08	1.0
Vub [10^-3]	3.63 +/- 0.15	3.83 +/- 0.57	0.3
gamma [degrees]	69 +/- 3	79 +/- 10	0.9
B to taunu [10^-4]	0.83 +/- 0.08	1.64 +/- 0.34	2.3
Bs to ll [10^-9]	3.55 +/- 0.28	18 +/- 11	1.3
Bk	0.88 +/- 0.09	0.731 +/- 0.036	1.4

NP update

New Physics fit updates: in the 2-dimensional plots of the NP parameters, the red cross represents the SM value.
- rho-eta plane: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/np.eps
  - parameter
    
    fit output
    
    rhobar
    
    0.129 +/- 0.040
    
    etabar
    
    0.392 +/- 0.055
- K system: 2-dimensional plot of the NP coefficients: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/C_epsKvsC_DmKfit1.eps
  - and 1-dimensional plots:
    - C_epsK: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/C_epsKfit1.eps
    - C_DmK: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/C_DmKfit1.eps
    parameter
    
    fit output
    
    sigmas from the SM
    
    C_epsK
    
    0.98 +/- 0.17
    
    0.1
    
    C_DmK
    
    0.97 +/- 0.34
    
    0.5
- Bd system: 2-dimensional plot of the NP coefficients: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/Phi_BdvsC_Bdfit1.eps
  - and 1-dimensional plots:
    - C_Bd: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/C_Bdfit1.eps
    - Phi_Bd: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/Phi_Bdfit1.eps
    parameter
    
    fit output
    
    sigmas from the SM
    
    C_Bd
    
    0.79 +/- 0.12
    
    1.5
    
    Phi_Bd
    
    -3.2 +/- 3.7
    
    0.8
- Bs system: 2-dimensional plot of the NP coefficients: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/Phi_BsvsC_Bsfit1.eps
  - and 1-dimensional plots:
    - C_Bs: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/C_Bsfit1.eps
    - Phi_Bs: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/Phi_Bsfit1.eps
    parameter
    
    fit output
    
    sigmas from the SM
    
    C_Bs
    
    0.84 +/- 0.10
    
    1.5
    
    Phi_Bs
    
    -18 +/- 10
    
    1.6
- more results on the Bs system: NP phase Phi_Bs with different constraints used
  - not using the J/psi Phi result: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/Phi_Bsfit2.eps
    - Phi_Bs = -45 +/- 19 (2.5 sigmas)
  - using only the J/psi Phi result: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/np/Phi_Bsfit7.eps
    - Phi_Bs = -10 +/- 10 && 72 +/- 13 (1.0 sigma)

postLP11 update: UTfit/postLP11

-  ⇤ ← Revision 88 as of 2011-08-24 12:15:17 → 
  Size: 9046
  Editor: apw133
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 97 as of 2011-09-14 13:36:20 → ⇥
  Size: 10110
  Editor: apw133
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 11:
+=== EPS talk updated ===
      * my EPS talk updated with the new numbers and the new plots:
         * pdf: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/bona-postEPS.pdf
         * odp: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/bona-postEPS.odp
         * ppt: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/bona-postEPS.ppt
-Line 12:
+Line 18:
-Line 28:
+Line 33:
+            * the discrepancy between the two values is at the level of 2.6 sigmas
-Line 36:
+Line 42:
+            * the discrepancy between the two values is at the level of 1.8 sigmas
-Line 54:
+Line 61:
+         * sin2beta compatibility plot without using the semileptonic results: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/pulls/pull_sin2bfit3_nosemileptonic.eps
-Line 59:
+Line 67:
-           numerical results:
+           same plot only rectangular: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/all_postEPS11_rectangular.eps
            * numerical results:
-Line 68:
+Line 77:
+           same plot only rectangular: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/angles_postEPS11_rectangular.eps
-Line 73:
+Line 84:
+           same plot only rectangular: http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~bona/utfit/postEPS11/sides_postEPS11_rectangular.eps
-Line 123:
+Line 136:
+   * postLP11 update: UTfit/postLP11

parameter	fit output
rhobar	0.132 +/- 0.020
etabar	0.353 +/- 0.014
alpha	88 +/- 3
beta	22 +/- 1
gamma	69 +/- 3

parameter	fit output	sigmas from the SM
C_epsK	0.98 +/- 0.17	0.1
C_DmK	0.97 +/- 0.34	0.5